Tuesday, December 30, 2014
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: How bad an Operating System can Windows 7 be 12 30...
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: How bad an Operating System can Windows 7 be 12 30...: How bad an Operating System can Windows 7 be 12 30 2014 Immediately after I save a photograph and then search for it to see where it was ...
Thursday, January 2, 2014
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: Suggestions for Microsoft 01 02 2014
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: Suggestions for Microsoft 01 02 2014: Suggestions for Microsoft 01 02 2013 Software that is part of a word processor, inherent to it. Whereby related documents can be stored ...
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: Suggestions for Microsoft 03 04 2012
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: Suggestions for Microsoft 03 04 2012: Suggestions for Microsoft 03 04 2012 1. Who wants to turn on their computer and find out that their desktop has been reorganize...
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: Suggestions for Microsoft 03 04 2012
The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News: Suggestions for Microsoft 03 04 2012: Suggestions for Microsoft 03 04 2012 1. Who wants to turn on their computer and find out that their desktop has been reorganize...
Saturday, October 29, 2011
5 suggestions for microsoft 10 29 2011
1. Why is it when I try and search my microsoft outlook for a mail item I cannot find anything.
It should be like this. One search box at the top of Outlook where by I enter what I know to be a key term and it searches and finds it in all email accounts.
Wouldn't that save the American worker a lot of time and increase productivity?
Isn't this supposed to be part of productivity software? How can you call it that when simple concepts like this are not taken into consideration.
2. Also the windows operating system has not been able to search and find items quickly on the hard drive if at all. It should just come that way and be installed to be able to do so.
3. There should be an easy way to put what computer an excel or word file was printed from in the footer section. But so far I have not found a way to do that, nor do I care to spend the time. Most people have at least two computers a laptop and a desktop or second pc. The reason for this is because they are inherently undependable. So often this means we have a very hard time organizing and finding files.
4. And the computer ought to be able to figure out rather quickly and easily how to network from one pc to another by using the network cable. But it does not, even when crossover cables are done. Why is this needed? Becuase one would want to save things on more than one pc because they are inherently reliable. And that network cable would be the easiest way to do that.
5. I also want every computer to have a manaul switch with light that manually disconnects it from the network, quickly and easily to reduce the threats of viruses.
Fix these things before you come out with a new operating system.
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2011 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 29 2011 at www.suggestionsformicrosoft.blogspot.com
It should be like this. One search box at the top of Outlook where by I enter what I know to be a key term and it searches and finds it in all email accounts.
Wouldn't that save the American worker a lot of time and increase productivity?
Isn't this supposed to be part of productivity software? How can you call it that when simple concepts like this are not taken into consideration.
2. Also the windows operating system has not been able to search and find items quickly on the hard drive if at all. It should just come that way and be installed to be able to do so.
3. There should be an easy way to put what computer an excel or word file was printed from in the footer section. But so far I have not found a way to do that, nor do I care to spend the time. Most people have at least two computers a laptop and a desktop or second pc. The reason for this is because they are inherently undependable. So often this means we have a very hard time organizing and finding files.
4. And the computer ought to be able to figure out rather quickly and easily how to network from one pc to another by using the network cable. But it does not, even when crossover cables are done. Why is this needed? Becuase one would want to save things on more than one pc because they are inherently reliable. And that network cable would be the easiest way to do that.
5. I also want every computer to have a manaul switch with light that manually disconnects it from the network, quickly and easily to reduce the threats of viruses.
Fix these things before you come out with a new operating system.
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2011 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 29 2011 at www.suggestionsformicrosoft.blogspot.com
Thursday, April 14, 2011
File renaming function in drop down menu of word 04 14 2011
Incorporate a file renaming function in the drop down menu of Microsoft Word. Why? Because often what we write is not completely developed before we first save it and therefore a more appropriate name or label cannot be chosen at the inception.
The renaming function would save much needed disk drive space.
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2011 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 14 2011 at: www.suggestionsformicrosoft.blogspot.com
The renaming function would save much needed disk drive space.
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2011 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 14 2011 at: www.suggestionsformicrosoft.blogspot.com
Friday, October 29, 2010
Two Unbridgeable Computers in one, one for internet and one for work 10 29 2010
A computer with dual unbridgeable sides, work and Internet.
Most all of the problems related to computers going down via infection are due to a virus acquired through the Internet.
Here is how we resolve this and save billions of lost down time and wasted work hours in our country and therefore become more profitable.
We need our computers of the future to have an Internet side and a work side. Under no circumstances can the work side be compromised by the Internet side.
Each side would have different and discrete physical switches on the computer. Most computers have more than one hard drive today so this would be one way to design this. But there should also be a way whereby a computer has an operating system for the Internet and one for work, (Work being, writing, excel, photo editing etc.) And the compromise of one operating system on the same hard drive as the work side does not affect the work side in any way.
All material downloaded would be scanned immediately after downloaded on the Internet side.
Any material downloaded from the Internet could be scanned and saved to a memory key.
I do not want it to even be this easy to compromise but the computer could have two wired Ethernet sockets one only for Internet and one only for work networks. The networked socket could indeed not accept an Internet connection, some kind of distinction could be made here, perhaps it could be as easy as to say that the wires in the Ethernet cable could be crossed differently between the Internet and network work sides. So that upon a Internet cable is plugged into the work side a warning on the screen tells to plug in the other socket. Or perhaps the incoming feed wire or wires from the Internet cable would terminate at the network work side and no connection therefore could ever be established because there was no electrical contact for that wire at the network work socket.
When the computer is switched off and then on to the other operating system, anything in memory would be cleared out so that it had no way of affecting the work side, and to a lessor extent vice versa.
This would save the country billions in productivity, but who am I ever to offer good suggestions.
Very little design changes would have to be made, except for the two switches and some gate issues related to the microchips, it could be done quite easily, and should be done.
It should be made a law that all computers should have to be made with a physical switch to turn off the Internet at the Ethernet socket. Such switches would have to undergo testing to military standards as to reliability.
A consortium needs to be put in place to address this.
I will repeat under no circumstances can a connection from the work side to the Internet side ever be "Bridged". It would not be a hard concept to achieve if intelligent thought and design was put to it.
A laptop would not have to be made any bigger to accomplish this and neither would a desktop.
Wireless internet will never be secure because any communications stream can always be captured mid air and decoded, this is a reality the computer and software industry must just accept. Also if there is a way to capture signals via detecting signals on the cable line or radiation on the screen simple measure should be put in place to prevent this, such as a random wire signal line or anti-emf technology in the screens and screen backings.
The work and intellectual property of this country, The United States of America needs to be a lot more secure and this is the way.
Get Busy and earn your money by helping us this way Bill Gates and Steve Jobs!
God Bless Those Who have to think for Others
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2010 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 29 2010 at:
http://suggestionsformicrosoft.blogspot.com/
Most all of the problems related to computers going down via infection are due to a virus acquired through the Internet.
Here is how we resolve this and save billions of lost down time and wasted work hours in our country and therefore become more profitable.
We need our computers of the future to have an Internet side and a work side. Under no circumstances can the work side be compromised by the Internet side.
Each side would have different and discrete physical switches on the computer. Most computers have more than one hard drive today so this would be one way to design this. But there should also be a way whereby a computer has an operating system for the Internet and one for work, (Work being, writing, excel, photo editing etc.) And the compromise of one operating system on the same hard drive as the work side does not affect the work side in any way.
All material downloaded would be scanned immediately after downloaded on the Internet side.
Any material downloaded from the Internet could be scanned and saved to a memory key.
I do not want it to even be this easy to compromise but the computer could have two wired Ethernet sockets one only for Internet and one only for work networks. The networked socket could indeed not accept an Internet connection, some kind of distinction could be made here, perhaps it could be as easy as to say that the wires in the Ethernet cable could be crossed differently between the Internet and network work sides. So that upon a Internet cable is plugged into the work side a warning on the screen tells to plug in the other socket. Or perhaps the incoming feed wire or wires from the Internet cable would terminate at the network work side and no connection therefore could ever be established because there was no electrical contact for that wire at the network work socket.
When the computer is switched off and then on to the other operating system, anything in memory would be cleared out so that it had no way of affecting the work side, and to a lessor extent vice versa.
This would save the country billions in productivity, but who am I ever to offer good suggestions.
Very little design changes would have to be made, except for the two switches and some gate issues related to the microchips, it could be done quite easily, and should be done.
It should be made a law that all computers should have to be made with a physical switch to turn off the Internet at the Ethernet socket. Such switches would have to undergo testing to military standards as to reliability.
A consortium needs to be put in place to address this.
I will repeat under no circumstances can a connection from the work side to the Internet side ever be "Bridged". It would not be a hard concept to achieve if intelligent thought and design was put to it.
A laptop would not have to be made any bigger to accomplish this and neither would a desktop.
Wireless internet will never be secure because any communications stream can always be captured mid air and decoded, this is a reality the computer and software industry must just accept. Also if there is a way to capture signals via detecting signals on the cable line or radiation on the screen simple measure should be put in place to prevent this, such as a random wire signal line or anti-emf technology in the screens and screen backings.
The work and intellectual property of this country, The United States of America needs to be a lot more secure and this is the way.
Get Busy and earn your money by helping us this way Bill Gates and Steve Jobs!
God Bless Those Who have to think for Others
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2010 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 29 2010 at:
http://suggestionsformicrosoft.blogspot.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)